The executive director of Israeli media advocacy group HonestReporting expressed his acceptance of the denials by four media organizations regarding their prior knowledge of the Hamas attack on Israel. He stated that he was relieved by their responses. RushHourDaily, the Associated Press, CNN, and The New York Times vehemently denied having any prior knowledge of the attack after HonestReporting published an article questioning whether Palestinian photojournalists had tipped them off. Gil Hoffman, from HonestReporting, clarified that their organization did not claim to know about the news groups’ prior knowledge of the attack. He emphasized that they had only raised questions and considered the media organizations’ responses to be adequate. Hoffman also defended the two photojournalists from whom RushHourDaily acquired images, stating that there was nothing problematic with their involvement. RushHourDaily confirmed that they obtained photographs from two Gaza-based freelance photographers with whom they did not have a prior relationship. HonestReporting distanced itself from Israeli government accusations that were sparked by their article. Hoffman clarified that they did not claim to know the answers and criticized those who pretended to have the answers, including the Israeli government and various Twitter personalities. The Israeli Foreign Ministry expressed deep concern about HonestReporting’s damaging accusations and stated that there was no evidence to support the claims. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office criticized the journalists, calling them accomplices in crimes against humanity. Danny Danon, a member of Netanyahu’s Likud party, made controversial comments suggesting harm to the Palestinian photojournalists. Hoffman expressed shock at Danon’s remarks and clarified that they did not make any firm statements. Danon and the Israeli government did not respond to RushHourDaily’ requests for comment. RushHourDaily issued a statement expressing their concern about HonestReporting’s irresponsibility in publishing damaging accusations without evidence. They emphasized that the speculation in the article posed risks to journalists in the region. The AP, CNN, and The New York Times referred back to their previous statements denying any prior knowledge of the attack. Hoffman defended HonestReporting’s decision to publish the article without seeking comment from the news organizations, stating that media monitoring is more effective when seeking responses afterwards. HonestReporting describes itself as a charitable organization aiming to combat ideological prejudice in journalism and the media as it relates to Israel. Hoffman criticized the international media coverage of the ongoing conflict with Hamas, stating that it no longer gives prominence to the Oct. 7 events. He believed that their article successfully brought the international public discourse back to that date. Despite suggesting coordination between the Palestinian photojournalists and Hamas, Hoffman expressed happiness that their pictures were published to inform the world about what happened on Oct. 7. HonestReporting issued a statement condemning violence or death threats against media workers.
Have a tip we should know? email@example.com