Major setback for Prince Harry in case against Associated Newspapers

Major setback for Prince Harry in case against Associated Newspapers

Prince Harry, Baroness Doreen Lawrence, Sir Elton John, and others have faced a setback in their privacy case against Associated Newspapers. A High Court judge ruled that certain parts of their case are inadmissible. Mr Justice Nicklin stated that allowing the case to continue in its current form would be an abuse of process and bring the administration of justice into disrepute. However, the judge did allow the claimants to take the rest of their cases to trial, rejecting the newspaper group’s application to have them thrown out. The judge also emphasized the significant public interest in preventing the claimants from using confidential documents in breach of an order made by the Leveson Inquiry 12 years ago.

Associated Newspapers, which has consistently denied the allegations, welcomed the judge’s decision. They stated that the information supplied to the Leveson Inquiry remains subject to the Restriction Order imposed by Lord Justice Leveson. They described the ruling as a significant victory for justice and the Mail, and emphasized that the claims made by Prince Harry and others are preposterous.

The Duke of Sussex and the other claimants launched their hacking case in October last year, citing confessions by a private investigator. However, the investigator later denied these claims, prompting the judge to warn the claimants that they may need to adjust their expectations. The case has yet to come to trial, and Associated Newspapers made several applications to the judge, including objecting to the claimants using copies of financial ledgers from the publisher of the Mail titles. These ledgers were provided to the Leveson Inquiry and treated as confidential. The judge upheld the newspaper’s objection, stating that the Court must recognize the significant public interest in observing a restriction order made under the Inquiries Act 2005.

In his ruling, Mr Justice Nicklin emphasized that allowing the use of material in breach of a restriction order would be an abuse of process and bring the administration of justice into disrepute. The case is ongoing, and a further preliminary hearing is scheduled for November 21.

About News Team

Hi, I'm Alex Perez, an experienced writer with a focus on lifestyle and culture news. From food and fashion to travel and entertainment, I love exploring the latest trends and sharing my insights with readers. I also have a strong interest in world news and business, and enjoy covering breaking stories and events.

Have a tip we should know?

Most Read

  1. News
    Pandora Papers Financial Leak Shows Us the Secrets of the World’s Rich and Powerful
    2 years ago
  2. Health
    US Supreme Court Rejects J & J TALC Cancer Case Appeal
    3 years ago
  3. Lifestyle
    9 Habits that Drain your Daily Focus and How to Avoid Them
    3 years ago
    Women’s Demand for Shapewear – the big Trends
    3 years ago
    Valentino Launches its Cosmetics Line
    3 years ago
  6. Health
    US Promises to Share 60 million Doses of AstraZeneca Vaccines
    3 years ago
  7. Health
    UK Offers Aid Amid Surging COVID-19 Cases in India
    3 years ago
  8. Sports
    Thousands of fans welcome Charlton funeral cortege at Old Trafford
    3 weeks ago
  9. News
    Brit left fighting for life after train derails in Argentinia
    3 weeks ago
    Dubai faces down airline rivals with $50 bln jet orders
    3 weeks ago
  11. Sunak
    UK’s Sunak brings back Cameron, sacks Braverman
    3 weeks ago
  12. Sports
    Man United’s Hojlund, Eriksen withdrawn from Denmark team duty
    3 weeks ago
  13. Health
    Autumn Sneezing Syndrome is on the rise… here’s what you can do
    3 weeks ago
  14. Canada
    Canada beat Italy to win Billie Jean King Cup for first time
    3 weeks ago

Follow @rushhourdaily: